Technology and Us

“What is the best use of technology?”

This question is asked more and more as the pace of technological change has accelerated. Greater speed, power, inter-connectedness etc. can produce all sorts of obvious benefits. We visit distant places quickly and cheaply thanks to jet airplanes. We have access to cheap, reliable power in our homes and in our cars. With the computer revolution, we can create, manage, transfer and store vast amounts of data in ways that would have been unimaginable to earlier generations.

But with those benefits have come come very serious drawbacks. The jet that can whisk you to Hawaii or Paris can also be used to kill thousands of people and inflict billions of dollars of damage. Cheap power is often generated by unsafe, polluting plants. Computer technology and the internet can be used to invade our privacy and spread false information around the world at the click of a mouse.

“What is the best use of technology?” is certainly an important question, one that probably deserves a good deal more attention than it has received.

But there is another, related, question that is rarely asked – one that I believe is ultimately far more important:

“How do we make the best use of ourselves as we live our lives in a world of rapidly changing technologies?”

Take a moment to consider our interaction with computers. I first saw computers being routinely used in the mid-1960s by ticket agents in airports. Now they are everywhere.

By the early 1980’s people were just starting to discuss Video Display Terminal (VDT) problems with eyes, neck pain etc. Terms like Repetitive Stress Injury (RSI) and carpal tunnel syndrome entered our everyday language. Today it’s  commonplace to see people wearing special braces for their lower arms and wrists. Surgery is increasingly common.

Why did this happen? Was it faulty computer and furniture design?

That’s what ergonomists have generally argued. And now a whole industry has sprung up to re-design the work environment to make injuries less likely. Countless magazine and newspaper articles give ergonomically-inspired advice on proper sitting, screen and keyboard placement etc.

Yet the RSI epidemic continues unabated nonetheless.


I believe the principal reason is that we rarely turn our attention on ourselves, and how we function as we go through life.  We don’t usually ask ourselves “What am I doing to myself as I drive, as I walk, as I clean the dishes? As I use my computer?”

The best ergonomic design will do nothing to prevent RSI if we are inadvertently creating the tension that causes RSI. Ergonomic principles are not without value, but they are only a small part of the solution.

So how can you learn to use yourself more efficiently? Is there a method you can learn?

The work of F. Matthias Alexander, today commonly referred to as the Alexander Technique, is just such a method. It has a long history of helping people with stress-related issues. And the whole question of how we use ourselves – and how we can learn to use ourselves better – was precisely the focus of Alexander’s work. Indeed his third book was titled The Use of the Self.

F. Matthias Alexander giving John Dewey a lesson in the Alexander Technique

The introductions to this and two other books by Alexander were written by Professor John Dewey. Dewey was America’s most famous philosopher and a leading proponent of the school of philosophy known as Pragmatism. He was also very influential in the development of American education in the first part of the last century. He is sometimes called “The father of American education.”

Dewey knew from firsthand experience that Alexander’s ideas and teaching method was of the utmost importance to us all as we faced the challenges of rapid technological change.

In his 1932 introduction to The Use of the Self he wrote about the changes that were going on at the time and which ultimately were used during a war so terrible that nobody could have imagined it at the time, although when you read Dewey’s words below, you can’t help seeing some serious concern about the future.

Here’s what he wrote:

In the present state of the world, it is evident that the control we have gained of physical energies, heat, light, electricity, etc., without having first secured control of our use of ourselves is a perilous affair. Without the control of our use of ourselves, our use of other things is blind; it may lead to anything.

If there can be developed a technique which will enable individuals really to secure the right use of themselves, then the factor upon which depends the final use of all other forms of energy will be brought under control. Mr. Alexander has evolved this technique.

This wasn’t just an abstract notion with Dewey. In his book Freedom to Change, the late Frank Pierce Jones of Tufts University wrote of a conversation he had with Dewey a few years before he died:

“(Dewey) said that he had been taken by (the Alexander Technique) first because it provided a demonstration of the unity of mind and body. He thought that the demonstration had struck him more forcibly than it might have struck someone who got the sensory experience easily and quickly, because he was such a slow learner. He had always been physically awkward, he said, and performed all actions too quickly and impulsively and without thought. ‘Thought’ in his case was saved for ‘mental’ activity, which had always been easy for him. It was a revelation to discover that thought could be applied with equal advantage to everyday movements.

“The greatest benefit he got from lessons, Dewey said, was the ability to stop and think before acting.”

Stop and think.  That’s what we must be able to do if technology is going to be a good servant to the human race.

Without that ability, it’s certain to become a terrible master.


This topic is a bit far removed from the usual concerns of Alexander Technique teachers and students – we’re more at home talking about coordination, balance, changing harmful habits of movement etc.  But if you have any thoughts you’d like to share, please do so.




Technology and Us — 17 Comments

  1. Hi robert,
    thanks for the reliable information.
    I always respect you. Since, you are orginator of the alexander technique in the web .
    Your passion to fill the web , with alexander concepts is forever.

    Fm believed his concepts and ideas through mirrors.

    This 20 th century has high resolution telescopes,cameras,and super computers, wireless phones, costly medical equipments, medical intensive care units, artificial heart legs hands, color tv, AC and variety types of alternative medicine


    why i need to believe a simple mirror?

  2. Pingback: Why Ergonomics Aren’t Enough to Prevent RSI

  3. Dear Robert:
    Wow! Thank you!! I may be a lot like John Dewey, as I had one of my greatest Aha moments during the time I was diagnosed with MS. The Alexander Technique is in me in my every intentional thoughtful movement that I make and has been life giving to me.

  4. Great post, Robert. The research pilot study that I was involved in at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center a few years ago focused on the use of the Self of surgeons using laparoscopic surgical instruments during minimally invasive surgery. Hopefully, we will be able to continue with this research at some point to bring home to more people the fact that, even though the ergonomic design of the objects we manipulate is important and helpful to consider, it is the self-use of the one who is using the technology which is essentially important to well-being and optimal functioning of both the person and the technological instrument he is using.

    • Hi Jennifer,

      That’s a great example of a technology that has all sorts of benefits and yet only works at it’s best when the human operators (surgeons) a using themselves well.


  5. Robert, I like this hugely, thank you! To me it is actually nearer the AT than ‘the usual concerns’; what happens at the point equipment (life) and I meet, no matter what I am doing. I hope lots of people read this and gain much needed hope and direction out of these very modern situations – RSI and CTS, etc, etc, and sadly etc…

  6. Pingback: Why Ergonomics Aren't Enough to Prevent RSI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.