Lilies of the Field

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not, they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.

This blog was inspired by a recent Facebook post from Fay Putnam, an Alexander Technique teacher in Portland, Oregon who thinks and writes a lot about breathing.  She wrote:

The circle of breath… the exhale and the return/arrival of air. So it goes. We pause; the breath arrives. We are born; we cry out. Think about it – the season of life, one big circle. The world cries out around us and it does not seem to wait for the breath of life to arrive. It seems to cry out more and more and more. The circle, the rhythm is broken. There is a void, an emptiness, a grasping for relief and air. Thus it seems, with all the noise about us. In our angst to grab relief as well as air we hold and keep it, that precious air.

The swirling noise becomes entrapped and our brains and voices become stuck. We cease to be full. It is ironic that we hold on to our stale beliefs and ideas along with the stale air. We even cease crying out, in our stuck selves. We are afraid there will not be enough; we take and grab breath. We are closed to the fact that to find our authentic voices, like our breath, we must give it away. Like the newborn, we must cry out; we must first exhale. We must cry out and wait for the arrival of new air, new life, new inspiration.

There is no escape; there are no shortcuts.  – Fay Putnam

Well, I thought to myself, this is an absolutely brilliant description of a basic fact of our existence: We live in at atmosphere which creates almost 15 pounds of pressure on each square inch of our body. Air is literally being pushed into us.  When let all the air out of our lungs, and allow our diaphragm and ribs to then create a vacuum, new air rushes in without our having to do anything.

Of course we can make an effort – sucking air in to try to get more of it – but that really doesn’t help in any sustained way.  And it can cause a great deal of damage.

F. Matthias Alexander was led to develop the Alexander Technique because of making this very mistake.  He faced the challenge of reciting before large and sometime noisy audiences with no PA system, and the results were not good.

When he used mirrors to determine what he was doing that was causing his problem:

I saw that as soon as I started to recite, I tended to pull back the head, depress the larynx, and suck in breath through the mouth in such a way as to produce a gasping sound. – “Evolution of a Technique,” Use of the Self

Could it be that Alexander had been just a little too eager* to recite effectively in this challenging situation, and that his eagerness caused him to gasp for air?  Air that was already being pushed into his lungs?

I believe Alexander’s major accomplishment can be seen as the development of a method that teaches practical ways for us to organize ourselves to benefit from atmospheric pressure – and from the other forces we encounter as we go through life. In Alexander’s case the immediate issue concerned the force of the atmosphere. I believe the same general dynamic appears with basic forces like gravity, support, and electromagnetic forces like light and heat.**

Unlike the lilies of the field, we humans can “learn” how to interfere with optimal self-organization.  Alexander came up with a method we can learn to bring it back.

Alexander also had a support issue. He writes that in addition to his gasping for air habit:

Observation in the mirror showed me that when I was standing to recite I was using these other parts in certain wrong ways which synchronized with my wrong way of using my head and neck, larynx, vocal and breathing organs, and which involved a condition of undue muscle tension throughout my organism. I observed that this condition of undue muscle tension affected particularly the use of my legs, feet, and toes, my toes being contracted and bent downwards in such a way that my feet were unduly arched, my weight thrown more on to the outside of my feet than it should have been, and my balance interfered with.

On discovering this, I thought back to see if I could account for it, and I recalled an instruction that had been given to me in the past…when I was taking lessons in dramatic expression and interpretation. Not being pleased with my way of standing and walking, (my teacher) would say to me from time to time, ” Take hold of the floor with your feet.”

Carrying out this instruction prevented him from simply allowing the floor’s support force to flow freely up through his body. As with gasping for air, he was attempting to grab something that was already there. And that grabbing prevented the force from being used effectively and intelligently.

As I said earlier, we receive all the forces of nature – we have no choice about that.  But we do have a choice about how we receive them and our choice can have a huge effect on how we function.

I’d love to read your comments below and/or on Facebook.

***

*Alexander was “end-gaining,” to use today’s Alexander Technique jargon.

**You can learn more about these forces, and how you can use the Technique to make the best use of them at Gravity, Support and Freedom

Lilly image copyright: supathral / 123RF Stock Photo

Who’s Minding Your Brain?

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

Our minds influence the key activity of the brain, which then influences everything; perception, cognition, thoughts and feelings, personal relationships; they’re all a projection of you. – Deepak Chopra

Alexander Technique teachers and their students have been successfully using their minds to influence their bodies, and parts of their bodies, for over a century. Alexander Technique Directions are mental processes whose purpose is to improve physical and mental functioning.

In a previous post, Taking a Walk down Easy Street, I described two sequences of Directions which I found very useful in walking, and in other activities.  The first began at the my feet and moved upward to my head, and eventually to my eyes.  The second traveled back down from my eyes to my feet.

The particular sequences I used were inspired by Imogen Ragone who shared with me a Direction she had thought of: “I am free to notice ease in my feet.” I experimented with it, found it very helpful and was inspired to expand on that idea.

But I realize now that I could have taken it one one step further and go to the source, so to speak, and  include: “I am free to notice ease in my brain.”

And that – whether used by itself or as part of a sequence – has turned out to be extremely powerful in all sorts of ways.

Here are what some members of Imogen’s Facebook page BodyIntelligence Community reported when using that Direction:

Image courtesy of Imogen Ragone

My shoulders tend to drop when I think this thought.

I have noticed ease in my brain and it has a calming effect for me.

Taking time to feel at ease with my brain is like checking in on my thoughts to see if they are compatible with my beliefs.

I’ve been finding this thought very useful, and have tried it out in various situations, including walking, as you suggested. I usually, however, notice the most significant effect when I’m working at my computer, or thinking about work!! The first thing I typically notice is a sense of spaciousness inside and out, accompanied by a deep breath that just happens spontaneously, and an overall sense of ease. I also often notice a letting go in my shoulders, too.

For me, the effects were most pronounced when I used the Direction while walking – it seemed to reorganize my whole body, especially my legs, so that it operated in an easier and more efficient manner.

It’s not at all surprising that individual experiences would be so varied.  The brain, after all, controls just about everything in ourselves, directly or indirectly.  Which is why, for example, a brain tumor which puts pressure on brain tissue, can have a huge variety of unpleasant effects, depending on where that pressure on the brain takes place.

One of things I like about the new “Brain Direction” it is that I am not able to directly sense the effects of this Direction in my brain itself.*  The effects are, however, quite apparent in other parts of my body. This “separation” is a useful quality for self-direction since it makes it easier to avoid being drawn into the Directlon’s effects while experimenting with it – making it less likely to forget the Direction that is causing those effects.

As I emphasized before, effective self directing requires softness of thought, no direct intent to actually make the Direction happen, and as little attachment in the moment as possible. (You can learn more about Alexander Technique directions and the art of directing at New Directions in Alexander Technique Directing.)

Obviously the experiments with this new direction are just a start and it would be very, very useful to have readers experiment with it and post their own findings below and on Facebook.

And please, don’t think you need to have had any Alexander Technique experience!

***

*Some people seem to be able to directly sense changes going on inside their brains.

Brain image copyright: nerthuz / 123RF Stock Photo

What is the Alexander Technique? – Part 2

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

This is a question Alexander Technique teachers get all the time, and one I wrote about last January in What is the Alexander Technique?  It’s something I keep coming back to.

Teachers’ replies to this most basic of questions about the Technique vary dramatically.

Some teachers are able to come up with a short, clear and easy to understand answer.

Many others appear to be flustered, as though they’re being put on the spot, and often preface their reply with phrases like “Well that’s a tough question.” or “I was afraid you’d ask me that.” They may say something like: “It can’t adequately be described with words – you have to experience it for yourself.”  Sometime their answer is so jargon-riddled that it’s impossible for ordinary people to comprehend.

It’s easy for those of us who teach the Alexander Technique to understand the many reasons behind these seemingly bizarre replies – for example our unfamiliar way of thinking about posture, pain, and stress, our concern that anything we say can easily be misinterpreted, etc.

But still…it must seem bizarre to a questioner why there is so much reluctance to giving the answer to a  very obvious and basic question. A question which, if anybody ought to know how to answer, it would be a teacher of the Technique!

A brief pause here…nothing I’m writing here is meant as a criticism of my colleagues. I am, or have been, guilty of all these ways of describing the Technique.  It’s taken me years to feel confident and comfortable answering the “what is” question.

In this regard I owe a lot to the late Marjorie Barstow.  More often than not, she would begin a workshop by asking everyone for their definition of the Technique.  Of course some participants, new to the process, couldn’t answer the question, and Marj was fine with that.

Some of the answers were excellent. My favorite (and Marj’s too) was from one of her ongoing students, Dr Alfred Flechas.  He suggested: “The Alexander Technique is a way of learning how to release harmful tension from your body.”

I often use that answer myself as it seems to resonate with a lot of people. Sometimes I say: “Its a method of helping people do whatever they want to do more easily and with less unnecessary strain.”

And sometimes, particularly when my contact with the questioner if fleeting – going through customs for example – I say: “It’s a way to help people improve their posture and co-ordination.”

My current favorite answer – but definitely not for everyone! – is: “It’s a way to make the best use of our physical structure and of the forces that operate on us as we go about our lives on the surface our planet.”*

I’m always looking for better answers – which is one reason why at the beginning of my podcasts I ask the person I’m interviewing to give their short definition or description of the Technique.  In some ways it’s not surprising that many of the best answers come from Alexander students as they are often free of the trepidations many teachers have.

Actually, I’m much more comfortable these days talking about Alexander’s discoveries – what they were and how we can make use of them for ourselves.  But that is a topic for another blog.  In the meantime, you might want to read this excellent article by Alexander Technique teacher Nicholas Brockbank, What Did Alexander Discover – And Why is it Important?

One final thought: It’s interesting that F. Matthias Alexander himself never gave a concise answer to the question.  Indeed, as far as I know, he never even used the term “Alexander Technique”!  Maybe that’s because he started his teaching career as a teacher of the Delsarte Method**, shedding that identity only after he moved to England in 1904, and perhaps not feeling comfortable attaching his name to what he was doing.  From that time on, he generally referred to to his teaching as “the work” or “my work.”

Alexander was also very clear in his writings that he viewed his work as just the beginning of an ongoing process of discovery and innovation.

For me this history, and the very nature of the Alexander Technique itself, means there is no single “official” Alexander Technique definition.  Individual teachers, students and professional societies have come up with their own definitions of course.  But they can – and often do – change over time, reflecting new developments or the sort that Alexander expected would take place.

And now dear readers a final question: What is your definition of the Alexander Technique?

I’d love to read your answers below and/or on Facebook.

…

*More on the inspiration for this direction can be found at Gravity, Support and Freedom – and the Alexander Technique

**More on the Alexander/Delsarte connection can be found at Francois Delsarte’s influence on F. Matthias Alexander and the Alexander Technique

Image Copyright: lupobianco / 123RF Stock Photo

 

Taking A Walk Down Easy Street

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

Have patience. All things are difficult before they become easy. – Saadi

As I was walking in my neighborhood yesterday evening, I experimented with some new Alexander Technique directions, based on an idea that originated with Alexander Technique teacher Imogen Ragone. She has cleverly synthesized Jenniifer Roig-Francoli’s Freedom Directions with Mio Morales’ prosses of noticing ease in your body.*

Imogen suggested: “I am free to notice ease in my feet.”

I had earlier done some experimenting with this direction and the results were quite striking.  So I thought I’d take it to the next level.

But…before I describe that, a reminder that effective self directing requires softness of thought, no direct intent to actually make the direction happen, and as little attachment in the moment as possible. (You can learn more about Alexander Technique directions and the art of directing at New Directions in Alexander Technique Directing.  In addition, Imogen’s Face Book group, BodyIntelligence Community,  often contains helpful information on this type of thinking.)

With that in mind, I’ll go through two direction sequences I used. I generally used each individual direction within the sequences for a few seconds before moving on to the next.  These sequences are in no way meant to be an established procedure, but I do believe they can provide an powerful framework within with to explore F. M. Alexander’s method of self improvement.

Here are the two sequences I explored as I was walking:

Sequence 1:

“I am free to notice the ease in my feet”

“I am free to notice the ease in my legs”

“I am free to notice the ease in my pelvis”

“I am free to notice the ease in my torso and neck”

“I am free to notice the ease in my head and jaw”

“I am free to notice the ease in my tongue”

“I am free to notice the ease in my eyes”

At this point I’d continue walking for perhaps a minute or so and then use the following reverse sequence:

Sequence 2:

“I am free to notice the ease in my eyes”

“I am free to notice the ease in my tongue”

And so on, ending with:

“I am free to notice the ease in my feet?

Again, after walking a bit, I would start the first sequence again.

My experience with these sequences is that each direction seemed to build on the previous ones.  At the end of the walk I felt that I was indeed moving with a great deal more ease and freedom.

Please feel free to explore these sequences, and their individual components on you own.

Your comments/suggestions are most welcome – either below and/or on Facebook.

…

*My preliminary take on why this synthesis is so powerful is that it’s a helpful way to inhibit any subtle ideas you might have about “helping out” with the direction.

…

OK, this is totally off topic, but I couldn’t help humming this great country song, written and originally sung by Freddie Hart, as I was writing the blog. This is Loretta and Conway’s version:

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Lay Your Burden Down

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

21139668 - concept of stress of a businessman with a big rockThe other day I was working with one of my Alexander Technique students, showing her how she could stand with ease.  Like a great many people, she had a habit of pushing her upper torso back and her pelvis forward a bit as she stood.

As I gently guided her out of that pattern and into a different, and totally unfamiliar way way of standing – one in which she initially felt she was pitched too far forward – she exclaimed: “I feel like I just dropped a huge burden!”

As the late Marjorie Barstow would often say to students in a similar situation, “What you’re feeling is the absence of tension in your body”.

What’s going on is a shift away from using muscular effort to hold oneself and instead  intelligently utilizating of our built-in capacities to be easily upright – head balanced on top of our spine, torso balanced on our hip joints, legs balanced at our ankles, and the effective use of the basic forces of the earth.(1)  Of course some effort is still needed to stand, but far, far less than before.

Substituting balance for effort can be a challenge at first, not just because it feels so strange, but also because we often have a built-in bias towards using our muscles – instead of our thinking – to make changes that will cause us to feel “right”.

As F. Matthias Alexander, the developer of the Technique, said: “We are so brutalized by our belief in doing and muscular tension.”(2)

Letting go of that false belief lies at the heart of “Laying your burden down.”

***

(1) You can learn more about these forces and how we can make the best use of them here.

(2) Here is Alexander’s full quote on this topic: “The trouble is none of my pupils will believe that all they need to do is to think and that wish for the neck to be free will do the trick.  I can now with my hands make any alternation in anyone, but none will trust to the thought. We are so brutalized by by our belief in doing and muscular tension.” – from Training with F. M, a diary of Sir George Trevelyan, a student on Alexander’s first teacher training course. This quote comes from the period 1933-1934.

Copyright: alphaspirit / 123RF Stock Photo

The Leanings of Clinton and Trump – and the Future of the World

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

Recently I’ve been thinking about the concept of Leaning In, a phrase popularized by Sheryl Sandberg, the CEO of Facebook in her bestselling book Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead

For her, the phrase is a metaphor for being assertive and embracing risk in order to achieve the greatest level of success in the workplace. But as a teacher of the Alexander Technique, I’m particularly interested in the physical aspects of leaning in – or it’s opposite, leaning back.

Especially today when America – and the world – will witness the first Presidential Debate in which Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump go face to face on the same stage. Both candidates’ non-verbal communication patterns will be on view for all to see, including their leaning propensities.

Non-verbal patterns have been shown to be at least as important as words in influencing audiences, so the way the 100 million expected viewers react to what they see may well decide the outcome of the election.

It will come as no surprise that Trump is a big-time leaner-in.  At times so much that it has an element of aggressiveness.

Clinton doesn’t lean a lot, but when she does, it’s my impression that she leans back a bit – as if she wants to get away from her audience.  And that could explain some of her perceived failure to connect on a personal level.

(President Obama seems to hardly ever lean, but when he does, it seems to be slightly in.)

I’ll be glued to my TV this evening – 9PM Eastern time, 6PM Pacific time.  You might want record it in order to take a closer look at the candidate’s leaning patterns and I’d love it if you post what you see, either below or on Facebook.

***

Here is a podcast interviews I did with Imogen Ragone about the physical aspects of Leaning In:

And here are three earlier blogs related to this topic: The Posture of Power, The Posture of Power – Part 2, and Studies in Political Posture – Bernie Sanders

https://www.bodylearningblog.com/the-posture-of-power-part-2/Image courtesy of vectorolie at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

 

 

You’re a Nice Place to Visit, but Would You Want to Live There?

Body Learning Blog Posted on by
Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein

The most important question you can ever ask is: ‘Is the universe is a friendly place?’ – Albert Einstein

He added: … if we decide that the universe is a friendly place, then we will use our technology, our scientific discoveries and our natural resources to create tools and models for understanding that universe. Because power and safety will come through understanding its workings and its motives.*

Perhaps the most important question you can ask about yourself is something along the lines of: Am I a friendly place?

If we can say with certainly that the answer is “yes”, then we have every reason use our intelligence to understand how we function, and how to improve our functioning.

Luckily for us it’s easy to verify that “yes” is indeed the answer – at least in the realm of our posture and physical co-ordination – by using a “paradoxical” Alexander Technique direction.

Do you want to check this out for yourself?

Here’s how:

First, choose any activity you do on a regular basis.  it could be speaking, chopping vegetables, working at a computer, climbing stairs – anything you can easily experiment with.

My personal favorite for this kind of exploration is walking, so I’ll use that as an example.

Start by standing and very gently thinking to yourself I am not walking. Continuing that thought, move around the room. After a few steps, continuing to move, toss the I am not walking thought away.  After a few steps, gently bring the I am not walking thought back.

What did you notice at the moment you stopped thinking I am not walking?  And when you brought the thought back?

(If Alexander directing is completely new to you, here are a few more detailed instructions: First, absolutely no holding on to the thought I am not walking. You’ll almost certainly forget it, and when you notice you have, just gently bring it back.  In other words, be totally forgiving of forgetting. Second, if you’re adding extra thoughts – like This is silly or What does this mean? just gently tell yourself that those thoughts can be entertained later, but not during the experiment. Third, let go of any intention to make anything happen, or not happen.  Just the simple thought I am not walking. It may also be useful to choose a hard, or creaky wooden, floor and wear shoes with hard soles to make it easier for you to notice the sound made by your foot falls.  You can learn more about Alexander Technique directing here: New Developments in Alexander Technique Directing)

You’ll probably notice that when you switch away from I am not walking, your feet come down a little more heavily on the floor.  You might also hear a louder sound from your feet as they arrive at the floor.  And you might also sense a little downward compression in your torso.  And when you gently bring the direction back, there is less pressure on your feet and on the rest of you.

What’s going on here?

I believe that saying I am not walking is shorthand for this longer, more cumbersome, message for your body: I don’t want to walk in my usual way.  Find another way for me to walk.

You might well be thinking that logically your body would be just as likely to come up with a heavier, less efficient, manner of walking as it is to move you in the direction of lightness and ease.  After all, you only asked for a different way of walking.

However – and to me this is truly amazing – in my experience, with myself and my students –  that NEVER HAPPENS!  With walking – or swimming (I am not swimming) or using a computer (I am not using the computer) or pretty much any other activity.

I take that as an indication that my body (and yours!) is a friendly part of a friendly universe – that it wants the best for you and is just waiting for you to give it the opportunity to show how it can help you.

And that makes me happy and proud to be living in such a friendly location and motivates me to continue working to improve myself.

***

I’d love to hear your experiences with paradoxical Alexander Technique directions, and how you interpret them.

* Einstein also addressed the implications of the other 2 possible answers:

If we decide that the universe is an unfriendly place, then we will use our technology, our scientific discoveries and our natural resources to achieve safety and power by creating bigger walls to keep out the unfriendliness and bigger weapons to destroy all that which is unfriendly and I believe that we are getting to a place where technology is powerful enough that we may either completely isolate or destroy ourselves as well in this process.

If we decide that the universe is neither friendly nor unfriendly and that God is essentially ‘playing dice with the universe’, then we are simply victims to the random toss of the dice and our lives have no real purpose or meaning.

 

Einstein image copyright: photoestelar / 123RF Stock Photo

How the Alexander Technique helped me Overcome Terrible Customer Service and Useless Tech Support

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

ID-10067459This past week, I had to deal with two companies which, under the right circumstances, provide an excellent product but which have truly awful phone support systems.

I’m sure you know what I’m talking about: Long hold times during which you’re forced to listen to messages about how much the company values your business.  Service and tech representatives who are unable to help you because they have no idea what has been done already or simply don’t have the necessary training to help.  Bizarre phone loops that take you back to where you started.

I’m generally pretty good at moving up to a higher level of customer support. For example by calling the company’s corporate headquarters where there is usually an office to deal with persistent people like me.

But nothing seemed to work this time.

In both cases I needed to have a quick resolution of the problem and I found myself getting more and more frustrated, inpatient and angry. I could feel the toll this negative energy was having on my body but it still took awhile for me to realize that I had a tool that could help  – the Alexander Technique – if I chose to use it.

Kind of embarrassing, since I’ve been an Alexander teacher for over 35 years!

One of the companies* was Windstream, a regional provider of phone and internet service.  My modem had been randomly losing connection to the internet and the company agreed it was a problem caused by an error on their part.  I could have lived with that for a few days if I didn’t have several Skype teaching calls coming up, calls which would be almost impossible to do well with interruptions.

I was told the earliest a visit from a technician could be scheduled was the following week and that they couldn’t tell me if it would be morning or evening!  And that it was absolutely impossible (their words) to do it any sooner.

I cancelled a Skype session scheduled for early the next morning and went to bed feeling trapped between an incompetent corporation and my teaching obligations.  As I usually do before falling asleep I did a bit of Alexander Technique self directing – “I’m free”, “My breathing is free”, “I’m free to receive the support of the bed” – that sort of thing.

Just before dozing off, I thought I might as well throw in a freedom direction about my predicament – “I’m free to find a solution to my connectivity problem.”

In the middle of the night I woke up with the thought “Time Warner”.  Yes, Time Warner, the giant cable company regularly voted the most hated company in America!  And for good reason: it’s customer service is as awful as Windstream’s and it’s much, much bigger.

Still, it did offer cable internet service that I’d used for years and that was quite reliable. It would cost significantly more than I was currently paying but when I called them the next morning, I was offered a guaranteed 1 hour window for installation that very afternoon at 4 PM.  That would be after my 2 in-person students, and well before my scheduled Skype sessions starting the next day.

This was an obvious way around the problem, but in my frustrated state I had overlooked it.

Put another way, the solution had been there all along, but I hadn’t be “free” to recognize and choose it.

My situation was not that different that of my Alexander Technique students. Once they’ve experimented a bit with using Alexander directions to change their posture and movement patterns I remind them that they now know there is a “free” state always available within them. Moving from their default state to the free state requires nothing more than a simple mental choice – for example thinking softly to themselves, “I’m free.”

But I had forgotten to remind myself!

Once I saw there was a choice, I was no longer focused on getting Windstream to do the right thing quickly.  I assumed they probably would not, but thought I’d make just one more call – this time not as someone pleading with them to do something for me, but as a lost customer they might be able entice back.

It was with in great sense of calm then called Windstream’s “Executive Customer Service” and outlined the problem I had been having. I then told the agent I was leaving them for an equivalent service I had arranged for later that day that would cost almost twice what I was paying them – precisely $24.52 a month more, I added.  Including taxes.

Unless they could fix my service that morning.

There was a long period of silence at the other end. The agent then said she would see what she could do. I thanked her and wished her a good day.

Forty-five minutes later, I got a call from the local office saying a tech would be at my house within 30 minutes.  He came, installed a new modem, re-set my connections with their central system, and made sure I was able to connect all the devices in my house to the new modem’s wi-fi.  He then, on his own, decided to check some wiring in an alleyway behind my house to make sure it was up to standard. It wasn’t, and he replaced a considerable amount of wiring.

Altogether he spent almost 2 hours making sure everything was working at optimal efficiency.

I then called Time Warner to cancel my appointment.

Thank you F. Matthias Alexander!  And thank you Jennifer Roig-Francoli, Mother of Freedom Directions!  You can listen to several podcasts about Freedom Directions, and other Alexander Technique directions here: bodylearningcast.com/teachers/directions

***

*The other case involved Tracphone, a cell phone company.  It was resolved in much the same way as my Windstream problem.

Photo courtesy of David Castillo Dominici Free Digital Photos.net

Striding Towards Freedom

Body Learning Blog Posted on by

I have always walked a lot.

As a child, my parents were just about the only people in the neighborhood without a car so if I wanted to go somewhere, I had to walk or take the bus. It was perfectly normal for me to walk 2 miles each way to see a movie, and of course I walked to school every day – about a mile each way for high-school. For awhile I had an after-school paper route that started a mile and half from my house.

Wherever I’ve lived – Washington, New Haven, Boston, New York, Toronto, London, and now Lincoln – I walk when I need to get somewhere as much as possible, and to explore new neighborhoods. Walking and swimming are my two favorite exercises.

Since becoming an Alexander Technique teacher in 1981, walking has taken on new meanings for me.  To start with, it was on a long Sunday walk in Toronto, the day after my first Alexander lesson, that I noticed strange things going on with my arms: my hands wouldn’t stay in my coat pockets, and my arms insisted on swinging freely!  Later on, I noticed that my walking was taking place with a lot less effort.

Over the years, it’s been an excellent activity for me (along with swimming) for exploring Alexander Technique directions.

It’s also proven to also be an excellent activity for my students to learn about directions, and how to use and test them.  See, for example. Throw it Away

One of the nice things about using walking as a teaching framework is that it’s an activity most of us are already doing over the course of our day.

I’ve also found that the rhythmical quality of walking, with the power of propulsion shifting  from one leg to the other, makes it relatively easy for students to notice how using – and then deliberately not using – directions affects their walk and how they can learn to preempt heavy footfalls with a useful Alexander Technique direction.

Finally, a wonderful aspect of walking is the auditory feedback it can provide as a student’s feet arrive at the floor, particularly with hard surfaces and especially creaky wooden floors. I often tell my students that if they have wooden floors somewhere where they live or work, that will be the perfect place for them to explore directions while walking.

Beyond these teaching considerations, I have found that walking is a wonderful way of letting my mind mull over a problem or question I’ve been working on. With surprising frequency, I find the solution or answer seems to just pop into my head after a nice walk!

A couple of years ago, I heard a wonderful two-part program about walking on the CBC Ideas series titled Walking Matters. That program inspired me to create the Centered Walking website. You can listen to the program here: Part 1   Part2

Since then, I’ve found three other excellent pieces about the many surprising benefits of walking:

The Slow Death of Purposeless Walking – from BBC News

Why Walking Makes Us Think – from the New Yorker Magazine

In Praise of the Flâneur – from the Paris Review

Finally, Henry David Thoreau wrote a wonderful short book about walking – a meandering ode to the simple act and accomplished art of taking a walk titled Walking

One step at a time is good walking. – Chinese proverb

Photo by Eadweard Muybridge an English photographer important for his pioneering work in photographic studies of motion.

The Plot Thickens: The Alexander Technique

Body Learning Blog Posted on by
F. Matthias Alexander

F. Matthias Alexander, developer of the Alexander Technique

The Alexander Technique has been around for over 125 years and so it’s not surprising that references to it, and to it’s founder F. Matthias Alexander, have appeared in works for fiction a number of times.

Some of those references have been funny, some bizarre, and some quite nice descriptions of the work. As such, they afford an insight into ways in which the Technique has been perceived over the years.

(My personal favorite is the story about Alexander, Dewey and Anzia from Norma Rosen’s book cited below.)

Most famously, Alexander shows up as a character in Aldous Huxley’s book Eyeless in Gaza, published in 1936. Huxley introduced Alexander in the person of Miller, a medical anthropologist. Miller, in the words Frank Pierce Jones “..also incorporated a part of Gerald Heard, whom Alexander detested, and a part of Dr. McDonagh, a fashionable but unorthodox physician to whom Alexander also referred his pupils.” (1)

For the next fifty years there are occasional references to “F. M. Alexander”, “Alexander” and even the “Alexander Brothers” here and there, but with no explanation of who he was.

In 1989, Norma Rosen wrote a novel, John and Anzia – An American Romance, about the (actual) relationship between Professor John Dewey and Anzia Yezierska, a Polish-American emigree from the Lower East Side of New York.

In Chapter 7, Yezierska accompanies Dewey and two of his friends to visit “the studio of the well-known body aligner, F.M Alexander.” Yezierska is a little hesitant, saying “I think I’m already aligned.” Nonetheless she does go.

Here are a few excerpts from the events that follow upon their arrival:

“…Alexander himself entered the room with a bouncy stride, as if a special spring twanged in his foot. He wore a formal suit and sandals with thick white socks. Everything about him seemed freshly sprouted, like the white carnation in his buttonhole. He turned his sharp-featured face to address them.

“‘You hear my voice? The full production, the roundness, the depth? This is my true voice, a fine instrument. Once it was crippled. I opened my mouth and croaked like a crow. In the middle of my favorite recitation piece, ‘Napoleon’–”

“He interrupted himself to recite theatrically, ‘Oh, lonely exile! Oh, armored ambition pierced!’ Then he went on in his normal, slightly less theatrical tone. ‘In despair at the loss of my voice I devised my technique. The results – you hear in my voice. Now you must listen and obey…

“We will not take ladies first. We will take the professor.” He clapped his hands onto John’s head, standing tiptoe to do it. “All your life your head has thought you. No you must think your head. Think and direct it, forward and up!”

Later, after working with the others attending the lesson, he gets to Yezierska:

“You also will experience difficulty in saying no to yourself my dear Miss. Nevertheless! Think only forward and up! Legthen and widen!”

“…The chair edge touched under her buttocks and for one moment she floated in a weightless crouch above the chair.

“Alexander whirled around. ‘This woman’s vertebrae have the ability to think!'”

More recently, a short story appeared in the New Yorker Magazine in 2007. It’s central character is an unnamed Alexander teacher in Boston – based on Tommy Thompson, an actual teacher there. From a conversation with Tommy I know he hates the story and it’s not hard to see why. Indeed it’s a pretty awful work of fiction on many levels, but you can judge it for yourself here. The Long Distance Client

Another Alexander reference (courtesy of Karen DeHart) comes from Writing Jane Austen: A Novel, by Elizabeth Aston:

“A stunned Georgina came out of the surgery with her arm in a sling and a prescription for a painkiller written out by Dr. Perry, and signed, after a further half-hour wait, by another doctor. She had an appointment in three weeks’ time with the practice physiotherapist, and friendly final advice from Dr. Perry that of course she could use the mouse and type with her left hand, but the chances were if she did that exactly the same thing would happen to that one.

“Maud turned out to know a good deal about RSI. “All young musicians these days are supposed to see Alexander practitioners,” she announced. “That’s probably what you should do. They readjust your body, and you learn how to do things, and how to do it better and you don’t put any stress on yourself. Only by the time it’s got as bad as it has with you, I’m not sure there’s anything much anybody can do about it. Except to stop doing whatever it is that’s given it to you. We had a pianist at school who had to stop playing for two years.”

The latest Alexander reference – this time a non-fiction book, but written by a popular fiction writer – also comes from Karen:

Moonwalking with Einstein – The Art and Science of Remembering Everything (page 11) by Joshua Foer : “When he walked, Buzan seemed to glide across the floor like an air hockey puck (the result, he later told me, of forty years’ training in the Alexander Technique).”

Buzan is Tony Buzan, author of Use Your Head, who one wrote: “The Alexander Technique transformed my life. it is the result of an acknowledged genius. I would recommend it to anyone.”

There may be other references I’m not familiar with. If you know of any, please let me know, using the Email Contact.

Footnotes:
1. Body Awareness in Action, Chapter 7
2. I am indebted to Loren Shlaes, an Alexander Technique teacher in New York City, for sending me a copy of this novel.